arbiter
JournalsAccount

Flow Search Experience: An Empirical Investigation Using Search Modality and Interaction Modality

Ahmed Mahfouz et al.

AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction2026https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00240article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In online environments, such as websites or mobile applications, users display one of two distinct search modalities: hedonic or utilitarian. Hedonic users typically navigate through a site or app for exploration, whereas utilitarian users focus more on retrieving specific information or completing a particular task. A platform’s features and immersive user interface (referred to as the interaction modality) influence these behaviors. The interaction modality can be categorized into non-immersive or immersive types based on the degree of engagement and telepresence capabilities. We conducted a controlled laboratory study to investigate how search modality and interaction modality influence the flow search experience. Flow search experience refers to an elevated state of focus and pleasure that leads users to become fully absorbed in their search activity. We found that, while search modality did not significantly affect the flow search experience, the interaction modality did; specifically, an immersive interaction modality enhanced the flow search experience compared to a non-immersive one.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00240

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ahmed2026,
  title        = {{Flow Search Experience: An Empirical Investigation Using Search Modality and Interaction Modality}},
  author       = {Ahmed Mahfouz et al.},
  journal      = {AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00240},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Flow Search Experience: An Empirical Investigation Using Search Modality and Interaction Modality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.