arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

One Giant Leap: Emancipation and Aggregate Economic Gains

Richard Hornbeck & Trevon D. Logan

The Review of Black Political Economy2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446251401881article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We characterize American slavery as inefficient, whereby emancipation generated substantial aggregate economic gains. Coercion distorted labor markets, raising the marginal cost of labor substantially above its marginal benefit. Production came at immense costs imposed on enslaved people that reduced aggregate economic surplus (the total value of output minus total costs incurred). Costs of enslavement are inherently difficult to quantify, which leads to a wide range of quantitative estimates from this conceptual shift, but we calculate that emancipation generated aggregate economic gains worth a 4%–35% increase in U.S. aggregate productivity (or worth 7–60 years of technological innovation). Emancipation decreased output but decreased costs substantially more, illustrating the substantial potential for aggregate economic gains in the presence of severe sectoral misallocation.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446251401881

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{richard2026,
  title        = {{One Giant Leap: Emancipation and Aggregate Economic Gains}},
  author       = {Richard Hornbeck & Trevon D. Logan},
  journal      = {The Review of Black Political Economy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446251401881},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

One Giant Leap: Emancipation and Aggregate Economic Gains

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.