Not on the same page: comprehensibility of MBS investment prospectuses

Martin Hibbeln et al.

Review of Derivatives Research2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-025-09213-8article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract We investigate whether originators of mortgage-backed securities lower the comprehensibility of disclosure documents to obfuscate low security quality. Utilizing commonly used complexity proxies primarily based on the volume of the investment prospectus, we find no impact on the performance of European mortgage-backed securities. In contrast, focusing on the comprehensibility as a combination of prospectus volume and text readability, we find that originators obfuscate low security quality by lowering the comprehensibility of the investment prospectus, resulting in greater defaults and lower returns. Investors only partially price these dimensions of complexity: Since the financial crisis, investors have been demanding a significant risk premium for prospectus volume but not for text readability. These findings underscore the importance of assessing comprehensibility of disclosure documents beyond traditional complexity measures and highlight potential implications for originators, investors and regulators in communicating, understanding and mitigating the risks associated with complex financial instruments.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-025-09213-8

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{martin2025,
  title        = {{Not on the same page: comprehensibility of MBS investment prospectuses}},
  author       = {Martin Hibbeln et al.},
  journal      = {Review of Derivatives Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-025-09213-8},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Not on the same page: comprehensibility of MBS investment prospectuses

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.