arbiter
JournalsAccount

Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China

Jie Ma et al.

Journal of Demographic Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.2article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Although fertility is typically regarded as a unitary family decision, a meaningful degree of disagreement in fertility willingness exists within households, especially for having two or more children. As China transitioned from a one-child to multiple-child policy, understanding how such disagreement affects fertility decisions is crucial. Using household data from the 2016 China Labor-force Dynamic Survey, we analyze fertility willingness in married couples. We find that over 10% of families disagree on having two or more children. Disagreement negatively impacts plans to have more children: only the husband wanting two children significantly reduces fertility plans compared to mutual agreement, while only the wife wanting two children does not suppress the plan. This is consistent with the wife's veto power in fertility decisions. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that more equal gender role and higher bargaining power contribute to the wife's veto power, offering insights into the mechanism of intra-household fertility decisions.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jie2025,
  title        = {{Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China}},
  author       = {Jie Ma et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Demographic Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.