A Scoping Review of Conversational Agents in Adolescence

Francesco Madera et al.

European Psychologist2026https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000580article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Conversational agents (CAs) are increasingly used to promote mental health, well-being, and social inclusion among adolescents. Despite growing interest, a comprehensive understanding of their effectiveness within an ecological perspective remains limited. This scoping review explored the existing literature on the impact of chatbots and virtual assistants on adolescents aged 10–25 years, adopting an ecological perspective. Following PRISMA guidelines, 56 studies published between 2011 and 2024 were identified across six electronic databases. Data extraction and thematic analysis highlighted that the majority of studies targeted symptom reduction (e.g., anxiety, depression), using CBT-based approaches and showing short-term positive effects. Fewer studies addressed social inclusion and well-being through positive psychology and mindfulness frameworks. Methodological heterogeneity limited longitudinal designs, and the dominance of Western samples was identified as a common limitation. Conversational agents show promise in promoting adolescent mental health and social inclusion. Future research should prioritize longitudinal designs, culturally sensitive adaptations, and standardized outcome measures to enhance the robustness and generalizability of findings.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000580

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{francesco2026,
  title        = {{A Scoping Review of Conversational Agents in Adolescence}},
  author       = {Francesco Madera et al.},
  journal      = {European Psychologist},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000580},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Scoping Review of Conversational Agents in Adolescence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.