Co-operative learning: The distinctive contribution of the Woodcraft Folk

Douglas Bourn

Journal of Co-operative Studies2025https://doi.org/10.61869/zbva7276article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The Woodcraft Folk was formed in 1925 and from its earliest days it developed close working relationships with the co-operative movement. Societies such as the Royal Arsenal in South London gave financial support to some of the earliest groups that were established. This close relationship has survived to the present day despite various hiccups on the way, including at attempt by the co-operative movement to set up a rival organisation, the Co-operative Youth Movement, in the 1940s and 1950s. This article, whilst noting this close relationship, aims to review the extent to which the Woodcraft Folk has seen co-operation and co-operative learning as an essential component of its educational practices. Reference will be made to the assumed ethos of co-operation throughout its history and how in the 1980s, influenced primarily by external forces from progressive educational movements, co-operation became recognised as a more central element of, not only its ethos, but also its educational practices.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61869/zbva7276

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{douglas2025,
  title        = {{Co-operative learning: The distinctive contribution of the Woodcraft Folk}},
  author       = {Douglas Bourn},
  journal      = {Journal of Co-operative Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61869/zbva7276},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Co-operative learning: The distinctive contribution of the Woodcraft Folk

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.