arbiter
JournalsAccount

Investigating perceived trust and utility of balanced news chatbots among individuals with varying conspiracy beliefs

Shreya Dubey et al.

Computers in Human Behavior2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.108920article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

In the current media landscape, various ideas and narratives gain traction, influenced by the dynamics of selective exposure and a decline in trust in traditional information sources. This trend holds the potential to cultivate polarization of perspectives, as individuals actively seek information that resonates with their existing attitudes. Hence, diversifying information that is available online can encourage users to engage with multiple perspectives, especially when provided by a trustworthy source. This paper presents findings from two studies which compared individuals with a higher belief in generic conspiracy theories (Study 1; n = 84) and specific conspiracy beliefs on climate change (Study 2; n = 23) to those with lower conspiracy beliefs ( n study 1 = 93; n study 2 = 35) on perceived trustworthiness and usefulness of the so called ‘balanced news chatbots’. These chatbots present a selection of opposing alternative and mainstream perspectives on topics of societal divide like climate change. We found that participants from both groups responded positively to the balanced news chatbot. Trust and perceived usefulness were identified to be key indicators of a positive attitude towards and high intentions of using such a chatbot, corroborating the acceptance of balanced news chatbots as a potential tool to reduce polarisation and conflict, piercing existing information bubbles. In both studies we also found that participants with higher conspiratorial beliefs responded even more positively to the balanced news chatbot than individuals with lower conspiratorial beliefs. We conclude that balanced chatbots are promising as a trusted source of diversified information for individuals with varying levels of conspiracy beliefs. • Selection biases when seeking information in online environments increase polarised beliefs on issues like climate change, raising the need for diversifying information. • In two studies, chatbots presented balanced climate change-related news to people with polarised views. • Trust and perceived usefulness predicted a positive attitude and intention to use the chatbot. • Participants from both groups responded positively to the balanced news chatbot.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.108920

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shreya2026,
  title        = {{Investigating perceived trust and utility of balanced news chatbots among individuals with varying conspiracy beliefs}},
  author       = {Shreya Dubey et al.},
  journal      = {Computers in Human Behavior},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.108920},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Investigating perceived trust and utility of balanced news chatbots among individuals with varying conspiracy beliefs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.