arbiter
JournalsAccount

Supererogatory consumer choices grounded in the human right to privacy

Richard E. Scott

International Journal of Law and Information Technology2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf010article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The deployment of privacy-reducing digital products is a well-known contemporary issue. Multiple conceptual, regulatory, and legal approaches have attempted to address it. This article illuminates a complementary approach yet to be explored: supererogatory consumer choices grounded in the human right to privacy. It argues that the operation of privacy is not limited to vertical relations of power under legal frameworks, but can also operate in horizontal relations of power by way of supererogation as it applies to consumer decision-making about digital products. The analysis posits that for privacy to be operationalized in this way, three prerequisites of related supererogatory decisions need to align, which are the discretion to make an unobligated choice, sufficient personal privilege, and a level of care for ‘reciprocal privacy’ that overcomes any applicable bystander effect. Despite the potential to protect privacy by supererogatory consumer choices, there simultaneously exists scope to abuse this idea via responsibilization.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{richard2025,
  title        = {{Supererogatory consumer choices grounded in the human right to privacy}},
  author       = {Richard E. Scott},
  journal      = {International Journal of Law and Information Technology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Supererogatory consumer choices grounded in the human right to privacy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.