Girls Dominate, Boys Left Behind: Decomposing the Gender Gap in Education Outcomes in Jamaica

Nicholas Wright

Economia, the Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA)2025https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.462article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper utilizes administrative data to investigate the gender gap in high school performance on various high-stakes exams and the gender disparity in academic outcomes at the leading university in the Caribbean. The results show that female students outperformed their male peers, being 8.5 and 6.6 percentage points more likely to pass a generic subject in the Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate (CSEC) and Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examination (CAPE) exams, respectively. These results are robust across subject type, school ownership, school rank, and subject difficulty. In addition, more females are admitted to each degree program annually and continue to outperform males regardless of age, enrollment status, or admission scores. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition indicates that school attributes, subject-cohort composition, and subject choice explain up to 78% of the gender gap in CSEC and CAPE pass rates, while college readiness, college-level decisions, and field of study fully explain the gap in college GPA. JEL Classification Codes: I21; I24; J16; J24; N36

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.462

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nicholas2025,
  title        = {{Girls Dominate, Boys Left Behind: Decomposing the Gender Gap in Education Outcomes in Jamaica}},
  author       = {Nicholas Wright},
  journal      = {Economia, the Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA)},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.462},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Girls Dominate, Boys Left Behind: Decomposing the Gender Gap in Education Outcomes in Jamaica

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.