arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Countermeasures to misinformation: lessons from the social sciences and applications to education in the United States

Maithreyi Gopalan et al.

Evidence and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2025d000000076article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We synthesise evidence from about 400 studies on mis/disinformation published between 2010 and 2024, drawing on research from across the social sciences. Despite widespread misinformation related to education, we find few studies that focus on how it spreads or how to address 'systemic misinformation' in this context. Building on prior syntheses (Blair et al, 2024), we categorise the main strategies used to fight misinformation in the United States across various domains such as public health, climate change and science communication into four types: informational, educational, sociopsychological and institutional. We then assess which of these approaches, widely studied in other fields, might be most useful to thwart misinformation in the uniquely decentralised world of US public education. As past research has shown, informational strategies - like fact-checking, pre-bunking and labelling content for credibility - are the most studied. However, their success depends on many factors, such as the setting, how the message is delivered, the topic and the audience's beliefs. Educational approaches, like media literacy programmes, show some promise, but have predominantly worked in reducing online misinformation only. Interestingly, we find that sociopsychological and institutional strategies, though less studied - may be especially promising for addressing misinformation in US K-12 education. These approaches may be key in countering organised campaigns that contest equity-focused evidence-based teaching practices. We close by identifying ways to fill current research gaps and suggest combining the most effective elements of different strategies to examine what works - and in which contexts - when it comes to tackling misinformation in education.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2025d000000076

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maithreyi2026,
  title        = {{Countermeasures to misinformation: lessons from the social sciences and applications to education in the United States}},
  author       = {Maithreyi Gopalan et al.},
  journal      = {Evidence and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2025d000000076},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Countermeasures to misinformation: lessons from the social sciences and applications to education in the United States

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.