Context and proto-institutions in the emergence of transformative innovation policy: insights from Chile

Kristiaan P.W. Kok et al.

Science and Public Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf006article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Abstract In response to the need for exploring transformative innovation policy (TIP) implementation dynamics across sectors and contexts, this paper examines the emergence of TIP in the Chilean agri-food sector. Our findings indicate that TIP has been developing in recent years, primarily in high-level policy discourses, while implementation efforts and the coordination of concrete instrument mixes lag behind. Contextual factors strongly influence TIP development, which include (1) the organization of public administration, (2) national political dynamics, (3) national policy cultures, and (4) geographical contexts. Importantly, our work emphasizes the need for developing policy capabilities and underscores the significant role of proto-institutions in supporting TIP development, through innovation system coordination, science-policy advice, fostering cross-sectoral collaboration, multiactor engagement, and learning and experimentation. Better considering policy contexts as the starting point for developing TIP could advance its implementation and contribute to a broader understanding of TIP dynamics.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kristiaan2025,
  title        = {{Context and proto-institutions in the emergence of transformative innovation policy: insights from Chile}},
  author       = {Kristiaan P.W. Kok et al.},
  journal      = {Science and Public Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Context and proto-institutions in the emergence of transformative innovation policy: insights from Chile

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.