The Economic Value of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions for Influenza and COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Hui Yee Yeo et al.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01039-1article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Our review highlights heterogeneity in cost effectiveness by pandemic severity, intervention type, bundling of measures, and timing. Strategies that combined low-cost NPIs like masks or hand hygiene demonstrated better value, while socially disruptive measures like school and business closure incurred high costs with inconsistent cost-effectiveness outcomes. Integration with vaccines or antivirals further enhanced cost effectiveness. Evidence gaps include the scarcity of evaluations from low-resource settings and variability in country-specific value thresholds. Addressing these gaps is essential for guiding efficient and cost-effective pandemic preparedness.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01039-1

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hui2026,
  title        = {{The Economic Value of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions for Influenza and COVID-19: A Systematic Review}},
  author       = {Hui Yee Yeo et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Health Economics and Health Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01039-1},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Economic Value of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions for Influenza and COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.