arbiter
JournalsAccount

INDEPENDENT SAMPLES T TEST AND THE MANN-WHITNEY-WILCOXON TEST TO KNOW THE EFFECT OF THE DRILL METHOD ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES

Nurwiani Nurwiani & Lia Budi Tristanti

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods2024https://doi.org/10.56801/jmasm.v24.i1.1article
ABDC B
Weight
0.59

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the drill method on the mathematics learning outcomes of seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 5 Jombang. The pre-test results were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and for homogeneity using the Bartlett test. The pre-test results showed the data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The t-test indicated that the pre-test mean scores between the control and experimental classes were the same. However, the post-test data for the experimental class were not normally distributed, so homogeneity was tested using the Levene test. The Mann-Whitney test showed a significant difference, proving that the drill method affects students' learning outcomes.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56801/jmasm.v24.i1.1

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nurwiani2024,
  title        = {{INDEPENDENT SAMPLES T TEST AND THE MANN-WHITNEY-WILCOXON TEST TO KNOW THE EFFECT OF THE DRILL METHOD ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES}},
  author       = {Nurwiani Nurwiani & Lia Budi Tristanti},
  journal      = {Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56801/jmasm.v24.i1.1},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

INDEPENDENT SAMPLES T TEST AND THE MANN-WHITNEY-WILCOXON TEST TO KNOW THE EFFECT OF THE DRILL METHOD ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.59

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.70 × 0.4 = 0.28
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.