Factors determining willingness to choose hospitality services with robots in the era of Service Encounter 2.0: mediating role of value co-creation

Arun Mittal et al.

International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsoi.2025.152335article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Technology-driven service execution is known as Service Encounter 2.0. We examined the impact of selected constructs of "Technology Acceptance Model" (TAM) and "Stimulus Organism and Response" (SOR) theory on "Willingness to Choose Restaurant or Hotel" with Service Robots (WCSR)" in hospitality. With a descriptive approach, we collected data from 316 Zillennials (late Millennials and early Generation Z). The analysis was carried out using multivariate statistical techniques. It was found that social influence (SI) significantly influences attitude (ATT) and perceived usefulness (PU). perceived enjoyment (PE) influences value co-creation (VCC) and ATT. perceived trust (PT) influences VCC, ATT and PU; these three variables influence the WCSR. Also, VCC partially mediates the relationship between ATT & WCSR and PU and WCSR. These results provide valuable input for service managers in designing and customising their service to enhance customers' willingness to choose their restaurant.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsoi.2025.152335

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{arun2025,
  title        = {{Factors determining willingness to choose hospitality services with robots in the era of Service Encounter 2.0: mediating role of value co-creation}},
  author       = {Arun Mittal et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsoi.2025.152335},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Factors determining willingness to choose hospitality services with robots in the era of Service Encounter 2.0: mediating role of value co-creation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.