Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World

Ulfat Abdurasulov

Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient2025https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341643article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract This essay examines the Romanovs’ diplomatic correspondence with the Mughal and Safavid courts, focusing on the Muscovite court’s persistent use of Turkic in written communications. The remarkable tenacity of the Muscovite court in maintaining written communication in Turkic with most Islamic royal courts (even those that primarily used Persian) was primarily due not to inertia or tribute to long-standing tradition, but to the distinct role occupied in the Muscovite foreign chancellery ( Posol’skii prikaz ) by Turkographic scribes—translators and dragomans mostly of the Tatar origin—whose principal remit was providing language assistance for diplomatic correspondence. By the second half of the seventeenth century, these Turkic language translators had organized themselves into family guilds, playing a pivotal role in establishing Turkic as the dominant language for diplomatic correspondence. Once entrenched in Muscovite bureaucratic practices, this reliance on Turkic persisted—even in situations where its use might appear to have been counterintuitive or at odds with the strategic logic of a specific diplomatic mission.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341643

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ulfat2025,
  title        = {{Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World}},
  author       = {Ulfat Abdurasulov},
  journal      = {Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341643},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Soft Power of Empire: Muscovy’s Turkic Engagement with the Persianate World

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.