arbiter
JournalsAccount

Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021)

Thu Htet

Alternatives: global, local, political2026https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251412994article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Recent studies on Myanmar’s foreign relations during its democratic transition (2011–2021) focus on its relations vis-à-vis great powers through the lens of hedging and bandwagoning. This article puts forward diversification and prudence as alternative conceptual frameworks that foreground our analysis on small states’ agency and preferences in approaching Myanmar’s external engagement during the period of National League for Democracy (NLD) government. During the period, Myanmar diversified its relations with major regional and extra-regional powers such as, but not limited to, Japan, India and Russia in different issue areas (military, economic and ideational). In parallel, the NLD, or Daw Suu in particular, considered China to be an indispensable partner due to its geopolitical and strategic importance. Therefore, it pursued benefits from China that aligned with the government’s strategic priorities while properly assessing and mitigating risks from bilateral relations, for example, in its reduction of investment size in Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects. While two concepts are analytically distinct, collectively they fulfil a task of offering a more nuanced and contextually grounded picture of Myanmar’s external engagement, demonstrating how the NLD government diversified its external relations to reduce its overreliance on China while simultaneously engaging with it in a prudent manner.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251412994

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thu2026,
  title        = {{Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021)}},
  author       = {Thu Htet},
  journal      = {Alternatives: global, local, political},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251412994},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.