Bid‐Ask Spread Estimators: Current State, Gaps, and Future Research Agendas

Muneer Shaik & Medhansh Bairaria

Journal of Economic Surveys2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70067article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 125 peer‐reviewed articles on bid‐ask spread estimators published between 1987 and 2025. Using the PRISMA framework, we map the intellectual evolution of the field, identifying a significant shift from foundational parametric models to data‐driven approaches. While early research focused on simple covariance‐based metrics, the field has recently been transformed by significant technical advances. Our network analysis identifies five major thematic clusters ranging from market dynamics and liquidity definitions to microstructure in high‐frequency and volatile environments. We highlight a critical research priority: utilizing high‐frequency data to validate low‐frequency models for reliable application in unobserved contexts, such as emerging markets and decentralized finance (DeFi). The findings underscore the enduring relevance of estimators in construction of long‐span historical series and noise‐adjusted liquidity measures. Future research must bridge existing methodological silos by integrating behavioral finance perspectives and advancing real‐time analytics for fragmented, high volatile global markets.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70067

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{muneer2026,
  title        = {{Bid‐Ask Spread Estimators: Current State, Gaps, and Future Research Agendas}},
  author       = {Muneer Shaik & Medhansh Bairaria},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic Surveys},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70067},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bid‐Ask Spread Estimators: Current State, Gaps, and Future Research Agendas

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.