Revealed! Is online booking driven by emotion and function?

Dan Ren et al.

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management2026https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2025-0752article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how review targets and formats jointly influence consumers’ purchase intentions and the underlying mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach This study used three scenario-based experiments via Credamo, an online survey platform, to investigate the interaction between review targets (core features vs customer service) and formats (list-based vs narrative-based) on purchase intention, along with the mediating roles of perceived warmth and competence. Findings The results showed that core features in a list-based format significantly enhanced consumers’ purchase intention, with perceived competence mediating this relationship. Moreover, customer service presented in a narrative-based format was more effective, mediated by perceived warmth. Practical implications This study provides practical guidance for hotels to optimize the presentation of online reviews and the design of review-writing prompts and offers guidance on hotels’ marketing presentation. Originality/value This study integrates peripheral cues and content cues in online reviews, moving beyond a single-cue perspective and addressing a gap in the hotel review literature regarding the effective presentation of different review targets.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2025-0752

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dan2026,
  title        = {{Revealed! Is online booking driven by emotion and function?}},
  author       = {Dan Ren et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2025-0752},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revealed! Is online booking driven by emotion and function?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.