Revisiting the gender gap in innovation: A qualitative comparative analysis of high-tech new ventures in China

Thi (Alice) Ngo et al.

International Small Business Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426251410782article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Prevailing deficit logic suggests that women entrepreneurs underperform in innovation due to resource disadvantages; yet, growing evidence shows that gender does not consistently exert a statistically significant effect. We address this puzzle through a contextual–configurational approach, examining how entrepreneurs not only do gender but also do context in achieving a high innovation outcome. Using qualitative comparative analysis on a sample of high-tech new ventures in China, we identify three distinct innovation archetypes and make several key contributions. Thus, by integrating multiple theoretical perspectives, we develop a contextualised understanding of innovation in high-tech new ventures shaped by the interplay between gender, intangible resources and environmental dynamism. In addition, we reveal that the conjunction of women, gender and resource disadvantage can, under conditions of environmental turbulence, foster high levels of innovation, and finally, we reconcile the ongoing debate regarding the role of gender in innovation, offering a more holistic understanding of gender differences in entrepreneurship.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426251410782

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thi2026,
  title        = {{Revisiting the gender gap in innovation: A qualitative comparative analysis of high-tech new ventures in China}},
  author       = {Thi (Alice) Ngo et al.},
  journal      = {International Small Business Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426251410782},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revisiting the gender gap in innovation: A qualitative comparative analysis of high-tech new ventures in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.