Just Energy Transition in Africa: Towards Social Inclusion and Environmental Rights-Based Imperatives

Godswill Agbaitoro & Eghosa Ekhator

Business and Human Rights Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.30article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.48

Abstract

This article examines the concept of just energy transition in the context of Africa. It explores two key imperatives: (1) social inclusion and (2) an environmental rights-based approach to promote just energy transitions within African countries. The article looks at social inclusion from the perspective of local communities that host energy infrastructures, highlighting potential injustices and negative impacts that may arise from the energy transition. It further argues that social inclusion and environmental rights-based approaches can be useful tools for achieving just energy transitions in Africa. The article also analyses strategies that underpin social inclusion and environmental rights-based approaches within the governance and legal frameworks for energy transition projects in Africa, including empowering local communities to ensure the transition aligns with their socio-economic standing. The article suggests that adopting socially inclusive and environmental rights-based imperatives are significant steps towards overcoming and addressing injustices in energy transition projects in Africa.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.30

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{godswill2025,
  title        = {{Just Energy Transition in Africa: Towards Social Inclusion and Environmental Rights-Based Imperatives}},
  author       = {Godswill Agbaitoro & Eghosa Ekhator},
  journal      = {Business and Human Rights Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.30},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Just Energy Transition in Africa: Towards Social Inclusion and Environmental Rights-Based Imperatives

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.