arbiter
JournalsAccount

Connecting the dots: how social networks shape macroeconomic expectations

Rafael Kothe

Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-025-00472-0article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Standard behavioral frameworks often overlook how social network topology shapes the coordination of inflation expectations. To address this, I build a hybrid agent-based model that integrates “narrative-rooted” heuristics within a standard New Keynesian structural scaffold. In this framework, beliefs evolve through dual channels: performance-based selection (heuristic switching) and social diffusion (DeGroot learning). Simulations across canonical topologies reveal that seeding a target-based narrative in high-centrality nodes compresses forecast dispersion and accelerates convergence. However, a structural trade-off emerges: while performance evaluations dampen distorting narratives, strong social persuasion reduces volatility but simultaneously decouples expectations from economic fundamentals. This occurs because agents prioritize peer alignment over objective data, highlighting the double-edged nature of social networks: they stabilize expectations when credible narratives diffuse through hubs, but sever the link between beliefs and fundamentals when conformity overrides economic signals.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-025-00472-0

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rafael2026,
  title        = {{Connecting the dots: how social networks shape macroeconomic expectations}},
  author       = {Rafael Kothe},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-025-00472-0},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Connecting the dots: how social networks shape macroeconomic expectations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.