Motives that Matter: Conceptualizing a Theory of Needs, Knowledge Hiding, and Group Cohesion (TNKG)

Rajanala Ruchitha Devi & Abraham Cyril Issac

Journal of Knowledge Management Practice2026https://doi.org/10.62477/jkmp.v26i1.616article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study explores the influence of McClelland’s need for achievement, affiliation, and power on knowledge hiding and group cohesion in organizational settings. A qualitative research design consisting of open-ended essay questions with an inductive reasoning approach was used to conceptualize the theory of needs, knowledge hiding, and group cohesion (TNKG). The study reveals that motivational needs (affiliation, achievement, and power) influence knowledge hiding behaviour and group cohesion. Affiliation-oriented employees share knowledge, enhancing group cohesion, whereas achievement-oriented employees withhold knowledge to ensure a competitive edge, but not in all contexts. Power further influences knowledge hiding, with personalized power inducing strategic withholding and socialized power encouraging knowledge sharing for collective benefit. The study also reveals that knowledge hiding is not always dysfunctional, but a self-protective response to the perceived threat in the workplace. The study presents a theory of needs, knowledge hiding, and group cohesion. It offers new insights into the psychological motivations of knowledge-related behaviours in organizations, providing useful implications for enhancing knowledge management and team cohesion.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62477/jkmp.v26i1.616

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rajanala2026,
  title        = {{Motives that Matter: Conceptualizing a Theory of Needs, Knowledge Hiding, and Group Cohesion (TNKG)}},
  author       = {Rajanala Ruchitha Devi & Abraham Cyril Issac},
  journal      = {Journal of Knowledge Management Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62477/jkmp.v26i1.616},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Motives that Matter: Conceptualizing a Theory of Needs, Knowledge Hiding, and Group Cohesion (TNKG)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.