arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Linguistic experiential priors account for notation-dependent numerical representations

Giorgia Anceresi et al.

Cognition2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106529article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The question whether the representation of numbers is abstract and notation-independent still sparks a fervent debate in the numerical cognition field. Here, we employed distributional semantic models to quantify the distributional history of Arabic digits and number words in natural language (i.e., from large-scale written corpora). In a first computational experiment, we demonstrated that the distributional history of numbers in language reflected distance effect-like relationships for both numerical notations. Next, in a second behavioral experiment, we used these specific distributional histories as notation-dependent experiential priors to predict participants' performance in comparison tasks employing both Arabic digits and number words. We observed that the linguistic experiential priors are not only constituting better models for behavioral performance than the real numerical distance, but we also found evidence for (partial) notation-dependent behavior. That is, our results showed that notation-dependent linguistic priors accounted for specific notation-dependent behaviors. These observations suggest that the specific distributional pattern of Arabic digits and number words in natural language reflect the way humans represent numbers, thus supporting an experiential-driven representation.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106529

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giorgia2026,
  title        = {{Linguistic experiential priors account for notation-dependent numerical representations}},
  author       = {Giorgia Anceresi et al.},
  journal      = {Cognition},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106529},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Linguistic experiential priors account for notation-dependent numerical representations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.