A conceptual tool to self-assess digital decarbonization readiness
Ian R. Hodgkinson et al.
Abstract
Purpose Technological advancements have been central to decarbonization efforts; however, this has led to an increasing, hidden digital carbon footprint. This study aims to examine how organizations can self-assess their digital decarbonization readiness with the aim of reducing their digital carbon footprint. Design/methodology/approach Using an integrative review approach, a canvas of the extant literature pertinent to digital decarbonization and the related fields of Green IT, digital, ICT and technology literatures, draws together insights that could be used by organizations to self-assess their digital decarbonization readiness. Findings The conceptual tool comprises ten dimensions against which organizations self-assess to generate an overview of the organization’s performance in each dimension, highlighting areas of strength (high scores) and areas that may need improvement (low scores), and an aggregate score representing the organization’s overall digital decarbonization readiness. Research limitations/implications In the context of global net zero targets, digital decarbonization represents an opportunity to mitigate the negative environmental impact of the new data-scape. To aid organizations in reducing their digital carbon footprint, the conceptual tool allows organizations to self-assess their digital decarbonization readiness. Practical implications The authors introduce a conceptual planning tool for Chief Information Officers (CIOs), Chief Technology Officers (CTOs), Chief Strategy Officers (CSOs) and Sustainability Leads to assess their digital decarbonization profile. Originality/value The study outlines a series of organizational skills and capabilities to successfully manage the digital ecosystem and contribute to organizations' digital decarbonization initiatives that may help to mitigate digital carbon footprints.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.