Non-standard employment in Cyprus: Trends and policy responses

Christos Koutsampelas

Cyprus Economic Policy Review2018article
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

The recent financial crisis in Cyprus caused considerable changes in the labour market, including a large rise in the various forms of non-standard employment such as temporary and part-time work. Using a variety of secondary sources as well as primary data analysis, this paper provides a general description of the trends and policy implications of this neglected topic in Cyprus. It is found that non-standard employment is usually met among women and young persons. However, during recession, non-standard employment increased considerably among men and persons with tertiary qualifications. Non-standard workers are explicitly protected by employment legislation. However, evidence shows that non-standard employees are discriminated in terms of pay compared to observationally similar standard employees. Inequalities in the labour market are translated into higher risk of in-work poverty and disparities in social provisions, mostly in regard to the adequacy of earnings-related benefits, including pensions. The paper closes with a number of suggestions aiming at enhancing the policy framework so as to mitigate disparities between standard and non-standard workers.

1 citation

Cite this paper

@article{christos2018,
  title        = {{Non-standard employment in Cyprus: Trends and policy responses}},
  author       = {Christos Koutsampelas},
  journal      = {Cyprus Economic Policy Review},
  year         = {2018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Non-standard employment in Cyprus: Trends and policy responses

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.