arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

On inclusion in the workplace through narrative review and critical reflections

Oskari Rintala & Maria Ristimäki

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion2026https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-02-2025-0141article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This article structures findings on inclusion in the workplace across different levels of analysis to enhance understanding of its multilevel nature. Design/methodology/approach A narrative literature review synthesizes existing theories and bridges perspectives on inclusion in the workplace. Findings The individual sense of inclusion is characterized by belonging, uniqueness and acceptance. Interpersonal and organizational factors influence individual experiences through mechanisms such as inclusive behaviors, leadership and practices. Contextual differences in norms, values and power further shape the processes of including and being included. Originality/value Literature on inclusion is structured to help academics and practitioners narrow the gap between individual experiences and organizational aims related to inclusion.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-02-2025-0141

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{oskari2026,
  title        = {{On inclusion in the workplace through narrative review and critical reflections}},
  author       = {Oskari Rintala & Maria Ristimäki},
  journal      = {Equality, Diversity and Inclusion},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-02-2025-0141},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On inclusion in the workplace through narrative review and critical reflections

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.