arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Alternative proofs of the GNKD and KKMS lemmas: a game-theoretic underpinning

M. Ali Khan et al.

Economic Theory Bulletin2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-025-00287-zarticle
ABDC B
Weight
0.48

What the paper says

In this paper, we provide alternative proofs of fundamental results of Walrasian general equilibrium theory, and of cooperative game theory, by viewing them as results pertaining to a two-person qualitative or a one-person generalized game: in short, by giving them a game-theoretic underpinning. Under the first category, we have the Gale–Nikaido–Kuhn–Debreu (GNKD) lemma in mind, and under the second, the Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz–Shapley (KKMS) lemma.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-025-00287-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{m.2025,
  title        = {{Alternative proofs of the GNKD and KKMS lemmas: a game-theoretic underpinning}},
  author       = {M. Ali Khan et al.},
  journal      = {Economic Theory Bulletin},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-025-00287-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Alternative proofs of the GNKD and KKMS lemmas: a game-theoretic underpinning

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.