Return on Returns: Building Scientific Capacity in AIDS Endemic Countries

Caroline Fry & Ina Ganguli

Health Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70079article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We examine public funding for health research through the United States National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center's AIDS International Training and Research Program, which sought to strengthen scientific capacity in AIDS-endemic countries by providing African researchers with training opportunities in the U.S. We use a difference-in-differences framework with information on scientists who participated in the program and the research activities of African scientists working at their home institutions in adjacent topics of neglected tropical diseases. Relative to comparable scientists, those at institutions with returning trainees subsequently publish more on HIV-related topics, receive more grant funding, engage in more clinical trials, and their work contributes to a greater number of policy documents. These patterns suggest that following the Fogarty program, research, innovation, and health policy related to the AIDS epidemic in African countries became more active.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70079

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{caroline2026,
  title        = {{Return on Returns: Building Scientific Capacity in AIDS Endemic Countries}},
  author       = {Caroline Fry & Ina Ganguli},
  journal      = {Health Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70079},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Return on Returns: Building Scientific Capacity in AIDS Endemic Countries

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.