Teaching Style and Attitudes: A Comparison of Two Collegiate Introductory Statistics Classes

Summer Bateiha et al.

Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education2020https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1765710article
ABDC B
Weight
0.59

What the paper says

Many students who enroll in introductory statistics courses do not have positive attitudes about the subject. A 2012 wide-ranging study by Schau and Emmioglu showed that student attitudes do not tend to improve after completing an introductory statistics course. However, there is a need for more studies about attitudes in introductory statistics courses that utilize reform teaching methods. In this article, we present findings about student attitudes toward statistics in both a teacher-centered lecture-based class and a student-centered active learning class, taught by the same instructor. The overall results of this study were consistent with those reported in the study by Schau and Emmioğlu. Although on an overall level, it seemed that attitudes did not change for both classes, when each attitude component was analyzed on a deeper level, from both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective, differences were found between the two classes for the components of Effort, Affect and Cognitive Competence, Interest, and Difficulty.

23 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1765710

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{summer2020,
  title        = {{Teaching Style and Attitudes: A Comparison of Two Collegiate Introductory Statistics Classes}},
  author       = {Summer Bateiha et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1765710},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Teaching Style and Attitudes: A Comparison of Two Collegiate Introductory Statistics Classes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.59

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.62 × 0.4 = 0.25
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.