How does social monitoring strategy empower value co-creation: the moderating effects of urban digital infrastructure
Wei Yang et al.
Abstract
Purpose As value co-creation has become central to marketing practices, social media strategies have been extensively studied as a key approach to fostering co-creation. However, existing research has treated this strategy at a broad conceptual level, offering a limited understanding of the involved inherent “benefit-risk” dilemma. Building on service-dominant logic, this study aims to focus on social monitoring strategy – a more nuanced form of social media strategies. The study conceptualizes it as a distinct value proposition that promotes value co-creation, thereby mitigating the “benefit-risk” dilemma. Specifically, the study examines the direct effects of social monitoring strategies on value co-creation, mediating roles of absorptive and joint learning capacities, and moderating effects of urban digital infrastructure on these mediating mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on 340 firm-level survey data obtained from a questionnaire survey and public data from statistical yearbooks. Empirical testing was conducted using the AMOS and SPSS research methods. Findings A social monitoring strategy is a value proposition that promotes value co-creation. This process is mediated by absorptive and joint learning capacities, with the mediating effects moderated by urban digital infrastructure. Originality/value This study advances a novel perspective by conceptualizing social monitoring strategy as a distinct value proposition and investigating how it drives value co-creation. More importantly, it addresses the “benefit-risk” paradox highlighted in existing research. By introducing a moderated mediation model, it opens the “black box” between social monitoring strategy and value co-creation, underscoring the critical role of urban digital infrastructure in strengthening this process.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.