arbiter
JournalsAccount

Attrition in Randomized Control Trials: Evidence From Early Education Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa

Alejandro Ome et al.

Evaluation Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261438946article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of attrition bias in longitudinal education RCTs by comparing multiple attrition correction methods. Our analysis of three early reading experiments in Zambia, Ethiopia, and South Africa shows that treatment status is generally not associated with attrition, while baseline reading skills are negatively correlated with it. We estimate bounds under alternative assumptions about the attrition process. Our main contribution lies in proposing guidelines for selecting appropriate correction methods based on data characteristics, including the extent of treatment-effect heterogeneity and the correlation of attrition with baseline characteristics. These guidelines incorporate a novel diagnostic for assessing the plausibility of the stochastic-dominance assumption. The findings offer practical direction for researchers on how to design, implement, and interpret evaluations where attrition poses risks to causal validity.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261438946

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alejandro2026,
  title        = {{Attrition in Randomized Control Trials: Evidence From Early Education Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa}},
  author       = {Alejandro Ome et al.},
  journal      = {Evaluation Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261438946},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Attrition in Randomized Control Trials: Evidence From Early Education Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.