Indirect Inference of Stochastic Frontier Models

Hung‐pin Lai

Advances in Econometrics2024https://doi.org/10.1108/s0731-905320240000046014book-chapter
AJG 2
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

The standard method to estimate a stochastic frontier (SF) model is the maximum likelihood (ML) approach with the distribution assumptions of a symmetric two-sided stochastic error v and a one-sided inefficiency random component u. When v or u has a nonstandard distribution, such as v follows a generalized t distribution or u has a χ2 distribution, the likelihood function can be complicated or untractable. This chapter introduces using indirect inference to estimate the SF models, where only least squares estimation is used. There is no need to derive the density or likelihood function, thus it is easier to handle a model with complicated distributions in practice. The author examines the finite sample performance of the proposed estimator and also compare it with the standard ML estimator as well as the maximum simulated likelihood (MSL) estimator using Monte Carlo simulations. The author found that the indirect inference estimator performs quite well in finite samples.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0731-905320240000046014

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hung‐pin2024,
  title        = {{Indirect Inference of Stochastic Frontier Models}},
  author       = {Hung‐pin Lai},
  journal      = {Advances in Econometrics},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0731-905320240000046014},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Indirect Inference of Stochastic Frontier Models

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.