Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making

Patricia Tollmann et al.

Health Promotion International2026https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag024article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Health promotion at the local level requires coordinated action for the development of strategies to promote health and well-being. For structuring and implementing such processes, planning tools can help local coordinators. However, before starting the planning process, coordinators must navigate a broad range of available tools and identify those that best fit their local needs and conditions. Despite the availability of various planning tools for municipal health promotion, there is limited research on what kind of information can help health professionals choose the most suitable tool. To address this gap, the study investigates which specific attributes of planning tools are considered most relevant by municipal health promotion practitioners for informed decision-making. The study was conducted using the Group Delphi method, which involved experts in a participatory process to reach consensus on pre-defined statements. A total of 17 experts from intersectoral fields including municipalities, federal state and national institutions as well as academia took part. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Delphi results led to the identification of eleven categories. These findings provide a practical framework for describing planning tools in a way that meets the information needs of practitioners. By improving clarity and accessibility of tool descriptions, the results can support more targeted tool selection, enhance the efficiency of planning processes and ultimately contribute to a more effective municipal health promotion.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag024

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{patricia2026,
  title        = {{Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making}},
  author       = {Patricia Tollmann et al.},
  journal      = {Health Promotion International},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag024},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.