arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Why Changes Must Be Made to the Standards of Review Used to Determine Meaningful Attorney Involvement Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Berman Esq. & Musalia Kilasi Eric

DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal2016article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

No abstract available.

Cite this paper

@article{berman2016,
  title        = {{Why Changes Must Be Made to the Standards of Review Used to Determine Meaningful Attorney Involvement Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act}},
  author       = {Berman Esq. & Musalia Kilasi Eric},
  journal      = {DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal},
  year         = {2016},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Why Changes Must Be Made to the Standards of Review Used to Determine Meaningful Attorney Involvement Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.