arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Agreement in Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Disease Severity: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Reimbursement in Sweden

Martin Henriksson et al.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01040-8article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Proportional QALY shortfall agrees more closely than AS with qualitatively assessed disease severity applied in the Swedish reimbursement system but there are large variations in the qualitative assessments that cannot be explained by either measure. Further investigation is warranted to understand if this is an intended and desired outcome.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01040-8

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{martin2026,
  title        = {{Agreement in Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Disease Severity: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Reimbursement in Sweden}},
  author       = {Martin Henriksson et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Health Economics and Health Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01040-8},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Agreement in Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Disease Severity: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Reimbursement in Sweden

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.