Simple Simon and the Cult of Certainty: How Case Studies Offer What Pop Leaders Cannot

Derrick J. Neufeld & Julian Birkinshaw

Journal of Leadership Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70032article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Popular leadership ideas gain influence through clarity and certainty, often at the expense of nuance and theoretical depth. This paper examines the tension between popular leadership discourse and scholarly research, drawing on Bourdieu's field theory to explain why visibility and charisma tend to outweigh rigor in the marketplace of ideas. We argue that the business case study offers a productive alternative as a form of translational scholarship. Using examples from Ivey Business School, we show how cases engage leaders with context, ambiguity, and judgment rather than simplified prescriptions. In contrast to formulaic leadership narratives, the case method develops the capacity to think critically about complex, real‐world dilemmas.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70032

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{derrick2026,
  title        = {{Simple Simon and the Cult of Certainty: How Case Studies Offer What Pop Leaders Cannot}},
  author       = {Derrick J. Neufeld & Julian Birkinshaw},
  journal      = {Journal of Leadership Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70032},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Simple Simon and the Cult of Certainty: How Case Studies Offer What Pop Leaders Cannot

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.