arbiter
JournalsAccount

Exploring governance for sustainable transitions in renewable energy communities: A comparative inquiry of private and public initiatives

Nicole Dujany et al.

Energy Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115183article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

As interest in Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) grows due to their potential for decarbonization and decentralized energy governance, knowledge gaps persist regarding how different leadership styles affect their transformative capabilities. This study builds on the Strategic Niche Management framework to explore the divergences in governance dynamics of RECs initiated by public and private actors. Through a cross-case comparative analysis of six RECs in Italy, we examine how visions, social networks and learning processes diverge between the initiatives, influencing their alignment with sustainability transition goals. Our findings reveal that public-led RECs adopt inclusive, long-term strategies aimed at territorial resilience and citizen empowerment, but face constraints due to bureaucratic inertia and complexity. In contrast, private-led RECs demonstrate managerial agility and investment efficiency, often oriented toward short-term gains, with limited territorial embeddedness. These configurations reflect different trajectories of development with implications for their systemic impact. We contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice in the context of governance models, offering insights into how leadership logics affect the ability of RECs to serve as vehicles for a just transition. Our recommendations target policymakers and managers advocating for hybrid solutions that leverage the strengths of both actors to ensure scalability and equity in REC implementation. • Public and private-led Renewable Energy Comminities show distinct transition paths. • Strategic Niche Management reveals differences in niche governance models. • Public-led RECs focus on inclusivity and long-term territorial sustainability. • Private-led RECs prioritize efficiency and short-term incentive exploitation. • Hybrid governance models can enhance equity and scalability in RECs.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115183

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nicole2026,
  title        = {{Exploring governance for sustainable transitions in renewable energy communities: A comparative inquiry of private and public initiatives}},
  author       = {Nicole Dujany et al.},
  journal      = {Energy Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115183},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring governance for sustainable transitions in renewable energy communities: A comparative inquiry of private and public initiatives

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.