Autonomous but lonely: exploring the double-edged impact of idiosyncratic deals on career sustainability

Heng Zhao et al.

Baltic Journal of Management2026https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2025-0794article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the relationship between idiosyncratic deals and career sustainability. Based on self-construal theory and the JD-R model, the moderating role of self-construal was examined, followed by the mediating roles of work loneliness and job autonomy. Design/methodology/approach To test our hypotheses, we conducted a three-wave field study with a sample of 406 employees from high-tech firms in Beijing. Findings The results indicated that self-construal plays a critical role in the relationship between idiosyncratic deals and career sustainability. Specifically, employees with higher levels of interdependent self-construal are more likely to experience increased work loneliness when they receive idiosyncratic deals, which reduces their career sustainability. By contrast, employees with higher levels of independent self-construal are more likely to experience greater job autonomy when receiving idiosyncratic deals, thereby enhancing their career sustainability. Originality/value The study reveals the double-edged effects of idiosyncratic deals on employees' career sustainability, providing a more comprehensive perspective for research on career sustainability and its managerial implications.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2025-0794

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{heng2026,
  title        = {{Autonomous but lonely: exploring the double-edged impact of idiosyncratic deals on career sustainability}},
  author       = {Heng Zhao et al.},
  journal      = {Baltic Journal of Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2025-0794},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Autonomous but lonely: exploring the double-edged impact of idiosyncratic deals on career sustainability

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.