Does Economic Freedom Hedge Against Bad Luck? Evidence from Natural Disasters and Local Housing Price Appreciation

Michael Abrokwah et al.

Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-026-10050-1article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We examine the heterogeneous causal effects of natural disasters on housing price appreciation across 3,072 U.S. counties in all 50 states that vary in their levels of economic freedom. Using a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework and two decades of data, we find that although natural disasters generally dampen housing price appreciation, the decline is significantly smaller and more short-lived in counties with greater economic freedom. These results remain robust to the inclusion of comprehensive county and time fixed effects, alternative model specifications, and multiple robustness checks. Our findings suggest that economic freedom serves as an effective hedge against adverse shocks, such as natural disasters, particularly in the aftermath of severe events and for homes in the lower price range. Further analysis of the subcomponents of economic freedom reveals that government consumption expenditures, insurance and retirement payments, property and other taxes, and union density are the primary drivers of economic freedom’s mitigating effect.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-026-10050-1

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2026,
  title        = {{Does Economic Freedom Hedge Against Bad Luck? Evidence from Natural Disasters and Local Housing Price Appreciation}},
  author       = {Michael Abrokwah et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-026-10050-1},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Does Economic Freedom Hedge Against Bad Luck? Evidence from Natural Disasters and Local Housing Price Appreciation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.