Systematic and bibliometric reviews of cryptocurrency market regulation: trends, influential contributions, and future directions
Mohammad Zakaria AlQudah & Aurelio F. Bariviera
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to analyse the academic literature on cryptocurrency regulation using a combined bibliometric and systematic literature review approach, focusing on research trends, influential contributions and thematic clusters from 2018 to 2024. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews 62 journal articles published between 2018 and 2024. A combined bibliometric and systematic literature review approach is used to analyse key articles, journals, authors and countries contributing to the field. Thematic clusters such as crowdfunding, FinTech, blockchain vulnerabilities, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and economic forecasting in developing countries are identified. Findings The analysis reveals emerging trends and significant advancements in cryptocurrency regulation, highlighting key contributors in the field. Thematic clusters show a focus on blockchain vulnerabilities, the rise of CBDCs, and regulatory challenges in developing economies. These themes represent the most pressing areas in cryptocurrency market regulation. Practical implications The findings offer insights for policymakers, researchers and industry practitioners to shape effective regulatory frameworks, addressing critical issues such as blockchain security and central bank digital currencies. Social implications This research contributes to the development of robust regulatory frameworks, promoting market stability and transparency, which will ultimately benefit global financial markets and stakeholders in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to integrate bibliometric and systematic literature review methods to examine cryptocurrency regulation, providing a comprehensive overview of the research landscape.
11 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.57 × 0.4 = 0.23 |
| M · momentum | 0.78 × 0.15 = 0.12 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.