arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Status in Socio-Environmental Fields: Relationships, Evaluations, and Otherhood

Nadine Arnold & Fabien Foureault

Research in the Sociology of Organizations2024https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20240000090005book-chapter
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.72

What the paper says

Status distinctions matter among heterogeneous organizations within a socioenvironmental field. This is exemplified in the food waste field, where six types of organizations employ different excess strategies to address the issue. Theoretically, we propose that status is constructed internally through advice relationships and externally through evaluations. We posit that organizations conducting evaluations and advocating legitimate principles based on expertise (i.e., Others) are status winners. Our mixed-method study confirms that Others hold privileged positions and identifies status inconsistencies. By critically illuminating these status dynamics, we contribute to a better understanding of the roles of organizations and status in tackling socio-environmental issues.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20240000090005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nadine2024,
  title        = {{Status in Socio-Environmental Fields: Relationships, Evaluations, and Otherhood}},
  author       = {Nadine Arnold & Fabien Foureault},
  journal      = {Research in the Sociology of Organizations},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20240000090005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Status in Socio-Environmental Fields: Relationships, Evaluations, and Otherhood

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.72

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.