Stakeholder voices: exploring responsibility, trust and sustainable outcomes in a community leadership program

Joy Murray et al.

Action Learning and Action Research Journal2013article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

Five years after the end of a leadership development program four stakeholders explore responsibility for and sustainability of its outcomes. The stakeholder voices are those of the project leader and three participants; the context is a community leadership program for residents of government housing estates in Eastern Sydney. We take the position that the program leader is primarily responsible to the participants, rather than funding body, for the outcomes of the program. Being responsible to the participants in a community leadership program brings a whole new set of possibilities, in particular it means that leadership of the program is in the hands of participants. They must be the leaders from the beginning and across all facets: projects, monitoring, administration and evaluation. But first we have to define leadership. Later we have to define sustainable outcome. Behind the management of this program and the definitions that evolved lies a cybernetic/systems approach to action learning and action research.

Cite this paper

@article{joy2013,
  title        = {{Stakeholder voices: exploring responsibility, trust and sustainable outcomes in a community leadership program}},
  author       = {Joy Murray et al.},
  journal      = {Action Learning and Action Research Journal},
  year         = {2013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Stakeholder voices: exploring responsibility, trust and sustainable outcomes in a community leadership program

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.