A Conjectural Variations Approach to Detecting Collusion: The Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation Case

Qiwen Sheng & Tomislav Vukina

Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization2025https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2024-0020article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract In this paper we investigated the dynamic of competition in the U.S. broiler chicken industry from 2000 to 2023, focusing on the detection and the implications of alleged collusive behaviour. By employing a structural econometrics approach, we estimated the conjectural elasticities, offering an explanation for how potential collusive arrangements evolved over time. Our most important results show that the alleged collusion period elevated the conjectural elasticities for all defendants but increased the conjectural elasticity of the group of three largest publicly traded broiler companies the most. These results suggest that the industry tacit collusion could have morphed into explicit collusion, with the largest three firms being the likely leaders of the conspiracy. In addition, the computed Lerner indexes show that the market power has increased during the collusion period relative to the pre-collusion period and remained elevated afterwards, suggesting stubborn impact of collusion on competition even during the post collusion period.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2024-0020

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{qiwen2025,
  title        = {{A Conjectural Variations Approach to Detecting Collusion: The Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation Case}},
  author       = {Qiwen Sheng & Tomislav Vukina},
  journal      = {Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2024-0020},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Conjectural Variations Approach to Detecting Collusion: The Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation Case

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.