A goodness‐of‐fit test for regression models with discrete outcomes

Lu Yang et al.

Canadian Journal of Statistics2026https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.70046article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Regression models are often used to analyze discrete outcomes, but classical goodness‐of‐fit tests such as those based on the deviance or Pearson's statistic can be misleading or have little power in this context. To address this issue, we propose a new test, inspired by the work of Czado et al. ( Biometrics , 65(4):1254–1261, 2009), which involves no randomization, tuning parameter, or binning of covariates. The statistic's large‐sample distribution under the null hypothesis is determined; as it involves unknown parameter values, one must resort to a bootstrap procedure to compute ‐values. Simulations are conducted to investigate the ability of the test to detect a broad range of model misspecifications commonly seen in practice. The proposed procedure is seen to perform well in all the scenarios considered as well as on real data.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.70046

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lu2026,
  title        = {{A goodness‐of‐fit test for regression models with discrete outcomes}},
  author       = {Lu Yang et al.},
  journal      = {Canadian Journal of Statistics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.70046},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A goodness‐of‐fit test for regression models with discrete outcomes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.