arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Pantaleoni and Pareto on Labour Issues

Motohiro Okada

History of Economic Thought and Policy2025https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-001003article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This essay provides a parallel review of Maffeo Pantaleoni's and Vilfredo Pareto's thoughts on labour issues. Despite noteworthy differences in their theoretical angles on labour, both Pantaleoni and Pareto had faith in the self-regulating function of labour markets. Pantaleoni's and Pareto's adherence to this neoclassicism-backed liberal creed in contradiction to the nature of capitalistic labour caused vicissitudes of their attitudes towards industrial relations. With changes in Italy's industrial relations, Pantaleoni and Pareto shifted from being sympathetic to antagonistic towards labour movements. They finally inclined to Fascism in the expectation that the Fascists could restore market-directed Italian capitalism by ruthlessly crushing workers' power. Thus, this essay illuminates strong affinities between Pantaleoni's and Pareto's thoughts on labour issues.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-001003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{motohiro2025,
  title        = {{Pantaleoni and Pareto on Labour Issues}},
  author       = {Motohiro Okada},
  journal      = {History of Economic Thought and Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-001003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pantaleoni and Pareto on Labour Issues

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.