Conceived vs. Operationalised Innovation: A Study of Tourism Entrepreneurs

Jussara Danielle Martins Aires et al.

Tourism & Management Studies2025https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.20250104article
ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

This study explores the meanings and practices of innovation in tourism companies, focusing on the alignment (or misalignment) between conceived and implemented innovations. Drawing on 35 semi-structured interviews with managers of tourism businesses in Natal, Brazil, conducted and monitored from 2019 to 2023, the research provides a longitudinal perspective on innovation dynamics. The findings reveal that while managers' conceptualisations of innovation align with existing literature, the implementation often surpasses their initial conceptual scope. Innovation is perceived as continuous learning and adaptation driven by stakeholder interactions, sustainability imperatives, and market demands. The study also highlights the temporal dimension of innovation, as the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and rapid digital transformation intensified the need for innovative responses. These findings underscore the importance of bridging the gap between the design and execution of innovation, offering critical insights for developing effective tools to measure and manage innovation in the tourism sector. The research contributes to the global discourse on tourism innovation by emphasising the interplay between theory and localised entrepreneurial practices.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.20250104

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jussara2025,
  title        = {{Conceived vs. Operationalised Innovation: A Study of Tourism Entrepreneurs}},
  author       = {Jussara Danielle Martins Aires et al.},
  journal      = {Tourism & Management Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.20250104},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Conceived vs. Operationalised Innovation: A Study of Tourism Entrepreneurs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.