arbiter
JournalsAccount

Spoiler alert: Reliable distractor response cues benefit response selection.

Daniel Maurer & Christian Frings

Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory, and cognition2026https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001604article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Top-down control in choosing appropriate actions is a key ability of human cognition. While target-related foreknowledge has long been studied, recent research in various domains has focused on our ability to use foreknowledge about distractions stored in working memory. However, previous research has exclusively investigated distractor foreknowledge derived from stimulus features such as location or color. The present study examined whether the effective use of distractor foreknowledge can also be achieved when it is based solely on response-related information. We tested the effectiveness of distractor foreknowledge in a Flanker task by varying the type of foreknowledge cue. In two experiments (N₁ = 117, N₂ = 119), participants received either stimulus-related cues (i.e., the shape of the distractors was presented before the Flanker display) or response-related cues (i.e., the associated response of the distractors was cued before the Flanker display), both with 100% validity. Performance was compared with a control condition with no foreknowledge. We found that Flanker effects related to response interference were reduced irrespective of the foreknowledge cue type across both experiments. These results extend prior work on distractor templates, which have traditionally focused on stimulus features, by showing that response-related distractor representations can benefit response selection. We interpret the results against the background of the common coding principle. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001604

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniel2026,
  title        = {{Spoiler alert: Reliable distractor response cues benefit response selection.}},
  author       = {Daniel Maurer & Christian Frings},
  journal      = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory, and cognition},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001604},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Spoiler alert: Reliable distractor response cues benefit response selection.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.