← Back to results Central bank digital currencies: an old tale with a new chapter Michael D. Bordo & William Roberds
Abstract We consider the debut of a new monetary instrument, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Drawing on examples from monetary history, we argue that a successful monetary transformation must combine microeconomic efficiency with macroeconomic credibility. A paradoxical feature of these transformations is that success in the micro dimension can encourage macro failure. Overcoming this paradox may require politically uncomfortable compromises. We propose that such compromises will be necessary for the success of CBDCs.
1 citation
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000076 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{michael2024,
title = {{Central bank digital currencies: an old tale with a new chapter}},
author = {Michael D. Bordo & William Roberds},
journal = {Financial History Review},
year = {2024},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000076},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Central bank digital currencies: an old tale with a new chapter
AU - Bordo, Michael D.
AU - Roberds, William
JO - Financial History Review
PY - 2024
ER - Michael D. Bordo & William Roberds (2024). Central bank digital currencies: an old tale with a new chapter. *Financial History Review*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000076 Michael D. Bordo & William Roberds. "Central bank digital currencies: an old tale with a new chapter." *Financial History Review* (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000076. Central bank digital currencies: an old tale with a new chapter
Michael D. Bordo & William Roberds · Financial History Review · 2024
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000076 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10 M · momentum 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.