E‐Verify Mandates and Voting Behavior of Naturalized Citizens in the United States

Christian Gunadi

Kyklos2026https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70048article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a toughening of immigration enforcement in the United States. One of the major initiatives is E‐Verify mandates, which require some or all employers to check the work eligibility of new hires. This study examines the impact of E‐Verify mandates on the voting propensity of naturalized citizens. Using a difference‐in‐differences strategy that exploits the temporal and geographical variation in the implementation of the mandates across US states, the results of the analysis indicate a temporary rise in the likelihood of a naturalized citizen reporting that they voted in the most recent November election. This finding suggests that immigration enforcement policies directed at undocumented migrants may generate political responses from other migrant groups who are not directly targeted by them.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70048

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christian2026,
  title        = {{E‐Verify Mandates and Voting Behavior of Naturalized Citizens in the United States}},
  author       = {Christian Gunadi},
  journal      = {Kyklos},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70048},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

E‐Verify Mandates and Voting Behavior of Naturalized Citizens in the United States

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.