Homo agenticus in the age of agentic AI: Agency loops, power displacement, and the circulation of responsibility

Paul M. Leonardi

Information and Organization2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100582article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.62

Abstract

As attribution-making creatures, humans constantly seek to locate agency somewhere in their environment. Where we choose to attribute agency has profound consequences for our own sense of power, responsibility, and capacity to act. The rise of agentic AI systems disrupts these attribution processes, as humans encounter technologies that appear to act autonomously and control outcomes affecting human lives. Drawing on psychological research on apparent mental causation, I argue that agency attribution operates as an active process of power redistribution. When humans attribute agency to AI systems, they experience systematic “power displacement”—reduced sense of control and responsibility—even while retaining formal authority. This creates a paradox: the more autonomous AI appears, the less autonomous humans feel, regardless of their actual control. However, this displacement is neither permanent nor unidirectional. Agency circulates through predictable “agency loops”—recursive patterns involving delegation, attribution, contingency, reassertion, and reconfiguration—that can be strategically managed. Humans who understand how agency loops operate and intervene in them through strategic attribution processes can develop new forms of expertise and authority. The future belongs to those who understand that agency is always attributed somewhere—and that where we choose to place it determines who has power to act. • Agency attribution operates as a process of power redistribution when humans interact with AI, creating systematic “power displacement” even while humans retain formal authority. • Human-AI relationships unfold through “agency loops”—recursive patterns of delegation, attribution, contingency, reassertion, and reconfiguration—that can be strategically managed. • Humans can enhance rather than diminish their authority through strategic management of agency attribution processes, developing new forms of expertise as interpreters, mediators, and curators of AI. • Extends psychological research on sense of agency to organizational contexts, demonstrating how attribution processes actively construct the conditions for action and responsibility.

16 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100582

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2025,
  title        = {{Homo agenticus in the age of agentic AI: Agency loops, power displacement, and the circulation of responsibility}},
  author       = {Paul M. Leonardi},
  journal      = {Information and Organization},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100582},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Homo agenticus in the age of agentic AI: Agency loops, power displacement, and the circulation of responsibility

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.62

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.64 × 0.4 = 0.26
M · momentum0.90 × 0.15 = 0.14
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.